Top line (5) wins 86% + per race, you will lose every time betting 4/7/7/7, u need to revamp your betting Gavin.
Study the form and match with fitness.
Winning on the punt is not about picking just 1 horse a race, pro punters back many runners and set a book.
James
From: James Conway [mailto:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]
Sent: Sunday, March 25
Subject: RE: 28.8
Hi Gavin thanks for that.
Hong Kong track comes from their video replays on their hkjc web site. I only rate their fitness levels, if they are in their wrong races or cannot run, that is in for form guide for you to work out.
They may also start weeks late and lose their fitness, anyway I just haven’t got the time of 3 hours a Monday to rate 200 horses so that is car put not.
If you follow the leads I try and give and flexi bet or whatever your system you should be winning, a place bet, a Quinella or trifecta of pick 4’s.
You study the form I look at no form just call their fitness levels.
Last race yesterday, top 5 horses returned $6,000 and I found a 33/1 horse and a 81/1 horse in the pick 4.
If you lay horses you are a mile in front, but that is not every bodies cup of tea.
Some winning punters take double or quaddies with a first leg up in fitness.
So I have no idea of horses abilities especially in Hong Kong and their racing is harder because of their constant pace on and high humidity’s, it is a real challenge,
but the $35m in some pools members can get on bets like Quinella and duets.
Locally a call of pick 1 or two horses, saves about 50% plus of investments and works.
98% - 98.50% are low fitness ratings and many chances at times.
Contact again any time thanks, as I said I only call fitness levels.
James
From: Gavin
March 25, 2018 2:13 PM
To: James Conway
Subject:
Hello James
Just a quick question!
Back on the 5th of March you sent out a list of horses for Hong Kong racing that you said were - in your words - "99% - 100% fit". " Best of Best Fit Horses from track work in Hong Kong". There were 19 on the list, 2 ran last week at around the 50/1 odds and both run near last?
Today there is another 2 more Ultimate Glory in the 10th Race at 31/1, with 50 starts, 4W/ 15P, and Racenet can not even find when it last won? It has had 8 starts in the last 12 Months for 2 seconds, and is only running ONCE a month, if that?
The other is Shalluck in Race 3 - This one really has me wondering - Shalluck has had 12 starts for 2 wins 0 placing, however in its last 10 has had x0x0000000, it has not won of 65 weeks, this was back in Australia in Wyong R5 22/12/2016 1600m Good3 (Bm60), yes 65 weeks ago.
The other thing you stated in your email of wisdom was - "HIGH FITNESS LEVELS WITH SOLID STRENGHT FACTORS, THEY CAN RUN WELL". "READY TO WIN"
So the question is - Why can't you be up front and only pick the winner?
Instead of picking 7 horses in a race and claiming the glory still when a 2nd or 3rd horse picked comes in 1st ahead of your top picks. It does not make sense to me. All of us can pick 7 horses in a race and get the winner 90% of the time. You just have to be a millionaire to back them all.
I know you are going to mention percentage bets, but 2% of a $500 First 4 (4x7x7x7) - Big Deal, it would cost $9.60 for a $10.00 return, a full at $480.00 cost is only a $20.00 return? There are only 7 to 14 horses on average, in a race so the odds are pretty high of getting it. If an outsider gets up it would be only ass anyways.
You have given 2 horses today, that just contradict picking horses on eyesight fitness, over on paper form. You are not in Hong Kong.
And claiming the full dividend for each winning race is just false. I thought you may have been different to the other so called tipsters, but obviously not.
Disgruntled Follower - Who has been losing money!
